Sean Millerick

Has the future arrived for the Miami Marlins at shortstop? Or is the best yet to come? For my money, that's the biggest decision facing Miami's front office over the next five weeks, far more than any decision regarding staff ace Sandy Alcantara. Granted, that's because the Alcantara decision has never been a question for me— he should be viewed as untouchable, at least until clarity arrives on the league's salary situation next season. Shortstop, though? There's a ton for Peter Bendix to chew on between now and the trade deadline. At the center of the puzzle is Otto Lopez , the obvious choice to start at shortstop for the National League for anyone with eyes that isn't a fan of the Dodgers, Nationals, Phillies, or Reds. The MLB hits leader is having a career year. Lopez has either suddenly become one of the best shortstops in all of baseball or is simply having one heck of a flash in the pan effort as this season's Geraldo Perdomo. He doesn't even hit arbitration until next season. He's not a free agent until 2030. He was basically free for the Marlins to obtain in the first place, plucked from obscurity in what is becoming the best transaction of the Bendix era. Most importantly though, Lopez is working on his third straight season of being an above average MLB regular. Even if he ends up "only" being his 3.3 WAR 2025 self, he's worth keeping around for a team trying to win. Two problems on that score. The first problem is that two of Miami's Top 6 prospects, and two of their Top 3 healthy ones, are shortstops. Aiva Arquette and Starlyn Caba are both having strong seasons. Obviously, that's one of those problems that isn't really a problem at all for the Marlins front office. Yet it does mean that sooner than later, barring major injury, someone is either getting moved off their position or moved off the roster entirely. And then there's the second problem- are the Miami Marlins ultimately going to try to win right now? Even if if the answer there is "not until 2027", there's a strong case to be made for keeping Lopez given his contract situation. He is exactly the kind of player low payroll clubs like the Marlins need- cheap and controllable. Then again, just as strong of a case can be made that he will never be worth more than is right now. If Miami remains in the Wild Card race, all of this is moot. He won't be going anywhere. If they fall out of it though, it's really going to be fascinating to see how Bendix views Lopez. Is Lopez proof of concept that he can routinely go bargain-bin shopping for players? Or does he think he found a keeper here? Of course, if Lopez is a keeper and Miami is competing, that puts the team in the likely position of needing to add talent at the deadline. It's hard to see any truly impact upgrade not costing the Marlins one of Arquette or Caba. They can't trade a pitcher. They probably need Kemp Alderman this year. That really narrows the field of choices for Bendix to dangle to rival GMs. Outfield is deep, sure, but no one at the MLB level is doing the kind of position blocking Lopez is doing right now. Especially not if the team keeps transforming Kyle Stowers into a first baseman. Plus, none of those names carry the kind of cache a well-regarded shortstop prospect would. If Miami does actually buy, they may well buy big. That means a top prospect, and again, only the shortstops are healthy. As to which of those young talents the team should trade? I'll leave that call to far brighter prospect minds than my own. Fortunately for your reading interest, many of them work for this very website. All I know is there is virtually no world in which two of them are moved this summer, buying or selling. However, I do think it's safe to say that the time is fast approaching that the Marlins will have to decide who their shortstop of the future isn't going to be. When the team decides who the odd man out at shortstop is, Marlins fans shouldn't be surprised if they are moved in the team's biggest deadline deal. View full article

Maybe the Miami Marlins make a run for an NL Wild Card spot. Maybe they don't. One thing is for certain though. The Marlins need to find the Pete Fairbanks they paid for this winter. Obviously, the Marlins made this particular $13 million investment with an eye towards building upon last year's success and making a much more realistic playoff push this season. With plenty of June remaining, that remains the club's goal, even with the decimation of Miami's starting pitcher ranks over the past few weeks. Given that starting pitching depletion though, it's easy to see how an All-Star caliber closer would come in handy right about now for the Marlins. Unfortunately, Fairbanks has been anything but his All-Star self so far in 2026. The chief culprit? Way too many walks. Fairbanks is being dragged down by a ghastly 1.529 WHIP that would be his worst showing since his 2019 rookie campaign if the season ended today. Paired with what would be career worsts in ground ball rate (22%) and exit velocity (91.8), the story basically writes itself. More balls are getting hit in the air, balls are getting hit harder, more balls are leaving the yard, and the result is a 7.41 ERA that is inspiring very little confidence at the moment. So little, in fact, that two different Marlins pitchers have secured their last two saves, including Tyler Zuber 's career first when he had to bail Fairbanks out of another near disaster this past Saturday. And yet...his xERA is a respectable 3.60 number that is just a tick higher than his 3.44 career norm. Balls are getting hit harder, but his hard-hit percentage is at its lowest rate since 2023. K/9? Still pretty good. K minus walk? Strikeout rate? Swinging strike rate? All in line with previous, successful seasons. Then throw in the fact that three of his four worst outings can be hand-waved away as a result of weird usage, a very long layoff, childbirth, and/or injury. If even one of those had gone differently, Marlins fans are probably singing a very different tune right now. It really doesn't seem far fetched to think that things could turn around. Which is something the Marlins desperately need to happen. Again, that's a pretty self-explanatory take for those of you that still believe the 2026 Miami Marlins can make a run at the postseason. Having an elite closer was supposed to be the difference between the 2025 club and this year's model—the lack of one being a major factor in last year's push coming up short. Fairbanks righting the ship at a time the bullpen is being pushed harder than ever would go a long way in keeping those original 2026 dreams alive. However, Fairbanks getting right goes much deeper than just helping the wins outnumber the losses the rest of the way. For one, at some point, you have to think Bruce Sherman might start to notice the lack of return on investment Peter Bendix has been getting from his free-agent signings. Bendix has done an excellent job in many respects, but the free-agent track record has been shockingly bad. Now, you could fairly object that good players tend to cost real money. But then again, you (probably) aren't Bruce Sherman. Christopher Morel, Austin Slater...these are minor misses even for the Miami. Chris Paddack? Nobody's perfect. Fairbanks and his $13 million, though? That was a massive swing for this franchise, and thus far, Sherman would have been better off either setting that money on fire or trying to move from second to first in the race for MLB's biggest weight room. If Fairbanks is a bust as well, then it's not hard to imagine Sherman losing confidence in his general manager. No matter how that would play out, it's likely bad for Miami. Be it retightening the purse strings, considering another front office change, or both, it would be a big step back for the organization. Frankly, it's hard to see how this wouldn't negatively impact future Marlins payrolls unless either a salary floor does come to MLB or Sherman really only cared about spending enough this winter to keep MLB revenue sharing investigators happy. All of that though is pretty hard to quantify, speculative stuff. What is not hard to quantify is what a blow it would be to the Marlins organization if Fairbanks isn't at least good enough to flip for a more controllable asset this summer. Making the playoffs was certainly the hope for the 2026 Marlins, but it can't ever have been the expectation for the front office. Signing a top closer made all the sense in the world this winter in anticipation of eventually flipping him for a shiny new prospect if things didn't work out come trade deadline time. Because you know Bendix is going to be moving someone. There are too many holes on this roster, and that's just not how he operates. If it can't be Fairbanks...then it's going to be someone Marlins fans care a lot more about. Which won't be good for anyone. Bottom line? No matter how these next couple months go, the Marlins need to see some vintage Fairbanks between now and August. View full article

Happy Edinson Volquez day, Miami Marlins fans! That officially brings you halfway through Marlins no-hitter season. And hey, this time next week, you'll be two-thirds of the way home. That's when the twenty-eighth anniversary of Kevin Brown's no-hit, near perfecto rolls around. Twenty years apart, yet within the same week, came arguably the two greatest pitching performances in Marlins franchise history. In fact, if you go by game score, those are the top two, with Volquez somehow edging Brown out despite the fact he walked two batters, whereas Brown's only baserunner was a HBP on a guy who was really, really crowding the plate. Generally, this is the kind of thing I would leave in the capable hands of our resident Marlinsversarian, Mike Ferguson. He's certainly welcome to break down how only one other Marlins no-hitter cracks the Game Score Top 10...and it comes in at tenth. Tenth! Pushing A.J. Burnett and the Most Effectively Wild Start Ever down the charts I can get behind, but Henderson Alvarez, Al Leiter, and Anibal Sanchez? How can... Anyway, I digress. Fib too, as Marlins no-hitters might be the baseball topic I've written the most about over the years. Most recently, I spent some time last May pondering whether a no-no like Burnett's would ever even happen again with analytics at the forefront, and whether fans would even want it to. I mean, let's be honest here. If a starting pitcher under Clayton McCullough walked five through three innings and nine over the course of a competitive 3-0 game? I'm pretty sure Marlins Twitter would eat themselves over the bullpen mismanagement. However, just one year later, there's now another wrinkle to consider when it comes to how Marlins fans would react to a prospective no-hitter. Not just a wild and wacky one like Burnett's either. Even something as close to perfection as those Brown or Volquez starts could now go under the microscope in a whole new way. Why? Because as you might have read here, there, or everywhere since the Marlins adopted the practice last summer, the team is now calling pitches from the dugout. Meaning that a pretty sizable chunk of the strategy that goes into the feat of a no-hitter now lies in the hands of people that might never set foot on the field. Which begs the question- will that make a difference when it comes to celebrating the achievement? Obviously, Marlins fans will still be happy for the almost certain victory. But in that wider, "baseball is the best" sense, will a Marlins no-hitter today mean the same as the six previous ones? Would it even mean the same as MLB's two most recent no-nos, a pair of combined efforts from the Astros and Cubs? The last true one was all the way back in 2024 when Blake Snell did it, and the last Marlins no-hit effort was Volquez's 2017 gem. Now the answer is probably yes. Pitchers still need to execute, keeping those sliders on the corners and not hanging over the middle of the plate. Catchers still need to work some framing magic, even if the game calling is out of their hands. Plenty of athleticism is still required. If you extend this line of thinking to another sport, it's not as if fans ever question a record setting performance from a quarterback even though an offensive coordinator is calling the plays. So most folks would probably let Miami's pitching staff off the hook here. That definitely seems to be the prevailing sentiment amongst those of you that took the time to vote in a recent Twitter poll on the subject: All the same, I can't shake the sense that it seems worth asking. That there might be some potential for an asterisk to start being affixed, especially if it came to pass that the Marlins or any other team calling pitches from the dugout pulled off the feat more than once. If nothing else, it does feel like it makes the catcher much more of a passenger than ever before. I can still recall watching Charles Johnson and Miguel Olivo fielding questions left and right during the postgame pressers of the no-hitters they helped bring about. Particularly Olivio's, as I perhaps uncharitably thought it would end up easily going down as the highlight of his career. Does it change the accomplishment if there are now three or four seats at that podium, with coaches doing a lot of the strategy talk? It would appear that at least a few of you think so. Here's hoping the Marlins give us the chance to put this question to the test sometime soon. View full article

In case you missed it Miami Marlins fans, the next wave of baseball's labor wars are officially under way. Wednesday saw the MLBPA propose something that really did nothing to address owners' concerns. Thursday saw MLB propose something that the MLBPA exists to defeat at every turn. Throughout it all, and as always in these kinds of talks, fans watched people that tend to make far more money than them put something fans love in jeopardy so those people could make even more money still. Yep, these next six months are going to be a blast. Obviously, no one reading this needs me to tell you that the Marlins spending more money on payroll would be a positive for the Marlins viewing experience. It's not as if MLB just proposed a salary floor without knowing all 30 teams would be able to come up with the cash. Either Marlins owner Bruce Sherman et al. are willing to do so...or they plan on selling the team really quickly to some group that will. Not hitting the floor isn't an option, provided the penalties are similar to what they are in other leagues. So no matter what, if MLB gets their way, Marlins fans win. However, seeing as how MLB has chugged along without a salary cap to this point, it's more than fair to be skeptical about MLB getting one. The smart money remains on that not happening. Yet what does seem unavoidable is some kind of a closing of the gap between the league's rich and poor. And if that gap does close significantly, it could finally allow the Miami Marlins to flex the greatest weapon in their player acquisition arsenal. Miami itself. If you think of essentially every article you've ever read about the Florida Panthers, Miami Dolphins, and Miami Heat signing a free agent, you'll recall that you spent just as much time reading about the allure of Miami and Florida's lack of state income tax than you did about space under the cap. You never really see that talk for the Marlins though, outside of the precious few seasons they did spend aggressively, unless it is about players getting too old or playing too hurt looking for a soft landing in the sunshine. Unfortunately, the palm trees and tax free salaries don't mean much when the competition can freely outbid you to the extent the top spenders currently can. As Will Smith once said, "you gotta have cheese for that summer house piece on South Beach." Top players are content to earn more money elsewhere, and play snowbird instead. But if that gap is suddenly in the neighborhood of $70 million rather than $400 million? If the Marlins can market their geographic advantage to a similar extent that the Dolphins, Heat, and Panthers can? Proudly proclaiming to all free agents that Miami is decidedly, if nothing else, not Ohio? You'd better believe that is going to result in better players bringing their talents to Little Havana, just as they have to Miami, Miami Gardens, and Sunrise. So sure, there will almost certainly continue to be teams that spend more than the Marlins. There will be smarter front offices. If first round miscues continue to happen, that third Marlins championship will probably remain as much of a pipe dream as any of the proposals just issued by the MLBPA and MLB. The thing is though, Marlins fans don't need a guarantee of money buying a championship to benefit here. What they, and all those other fans of low payroll clubs need, is increased hope of having the chance to compete. As I've written about previously, nine of the last ten World Series winners were Top 10 in payroll. The exception was 11th. You're going to feel more confident about competing. More confident about getting more Ryan O'Hearns and less Christopher Morels. The current MLB proposal? That would be a dream come true down here, and one that isn't happening. Any salary change though that favors the league? It's going to result in that Miami part of their title mattering more than ever for the Miami Marlins, and that could end up being just enough to put them back in a title chase. View full article

Back in the good old days of December 2025, the Miami Marlins made a low-risk, high-reward signing when they inked Christopher Morel to a one-year deal. He was a former top prospect. He'd demonstrated significant power upside in the majors. It was only $2 million, with the potential to keep him cheaply for years to come as he was still arbitration eligible and wouldn't hit free agency until 2029. All reasonable enough. However, it was then reported that Morel was being brought in to compete for the first base job. Granted, he would be an improvement over the ball rolling into the first base dugout on account of no one being there— a real possibility given Miami's lack of first base depth at the time. Still, it seemed odd as he had never played the position before. It continued to be odd as no other competition was brought in throughout the rest of the offseason, despite zero statistical evidence from spring training suggesting he would perform well. Concurrent to all this lack of excitement at first base though, a supporting narrative had emerged that Miami was hesitant to block any of their superior internal options. In terms of actual first basemen, that meant Deyvison De Los Santos . Yet it was also suggested that there was concern about blocking Agustin Ramirez, Miami's breakout catcher with the bat of an All-Star but the glove of a Little League fourth outfielder. First base would be the easiest switch if the defense failed to improve behind the plate, since relegating him solely to DH duties wasn't an option at the time. Again, all reasonable enough, at least for a cash-poor team like the Marlins. The Ramirez element even helped to tease excitement for an aggressive promotion of defensive-wunderkind Joe Mack . There was certainly skepticism, but concern seemed unwarranted. After all, if it didn't work out, surely Miami would just move on. But then...the first two months of the 2026 MLB season happened, leaving every red-blooded Marlins fan and even a broadcaster or two to wonder what in the world Morel is still doing in the majors. Those spring training stats of his? Usually such numbers can be dismissed as meaningless, but in Morel's case, they were astonishingly predictive in hindsight. After slashing .150/.239/.200 this spring, he's gone on to post a .169/.222/.220 line in the regular season and has done so with roughly 20 more at-bats. Sure, he missed the beginning of the season due to injury, but there's been no indication he's still dealing with something. He's gotten nearly twice the number of at-bats Austin Slater did before being cut loose and is closing in on the sample size that was deemed enough to send Graham Pauley down to the minors. The defense has been poor. The offense has been worse. After a particularly poor performance the other night, he refused to be interviewed. There is zero track record of past success with the organization for him to lean on. As for those possibly acceptable excuses offered in the offseason? Pretty much all gone. It would have been impossible for the Marlins to make it any plainer they don't view Ramirez as a first base option. Since his demotion, he's played 14 games, with 12 coming at catcher and 2 at DH. And that's with Mack locked in at catcher after an early arrival and Liam Hicks having an All-Star caliber season. De Los Santos is hardly knocking the cover off the ball, but both his MiLB and MLB production this year tops that of Morel. Then there's the as of yet unmentioned issue of platoon splits. As fans are frequently told, Morel's presence in the lineup is often to give Miami a better chance against lefty pitchers. Which would be awesome—this team certainly does need help there—except for the fact Morel's 2026 stats against lefties aren't any better than the players he most frequently replaces. Want to guess which Marlins player has the fewest home runs off a lefty between Morel, Connor Norby, and Javier Sanoja? You only need one guess, which is one more than the zero dingers supposed power bat Morel has hit with Miami. In short, it's becoming increasingly difficult to conclude that Morel's continued presence is about anything other than money. His salary makes him the fourth highest paid player on the active roster. Which is frustrating seeing as how the Marlins have already moved on from their other offseason financial misfires in Slater and Chris Paddack. A case could be made that bad luck with other players has played a part. The Kemp Alderman and Griffin Conine injuries. The fact Ramirez was playing bad enough to need to demote. The fact that De Los Santos hasn't yet pounded down the door in AAA. Once again, all fair. Except...he's a veteran on a one-year deal hitting .169/.222/.220. Peter Bendix could throw a dart at a list of options and find someone that couldn't be any worse than that. Morel is hardly the only problem with the 2026 Marlins, but he's easily one of the biggest. He's also the easiest problem to fix. Bottom-line? It was a worthwhile experiment, but it's an experiment that has now arguably cost the Marlins multiple games. If the team doesn't learn their lesson quickly, it could cost them a season. View full article

Did I ever tell you about my greatest moment writing about the Miami Marlins? It came eleven years ago this past Sunday. The year was 2015. Miami was 16-21 under Mike Redmond. That fateful morning, I wrote an article making the case for why Redmond wouldn't manage another game for Miami if that record hit 16-22. Redmond was fired shortly after that afternoon's loss. Now, my editor at the time referred to my prediction as "pure speculation." Personally, I'd have preferred "astute analysis" of an owner in love with the legacy of his one successful season that was happy to change owners as often as Miguel Rojas changes sneakers. Jeff Torborg was fired at 16-22, and the Marlins went on to win a title. Jeffrey Loria was exactly the kind of owner who would be willing to believe lightning could strike twice. As my four-year old has taken to saying lately, easy-peasy, lemon-squeezy. After a true only in Miami adventure with Dan Jennings recently discussed on Fish Unfiltered, the club hired Don Mattingly next offseason. The Marlins haven't fired a manager since. Which brings us, dear reader, to current Marlins skipper Clayton McCullough and the point of that parable. For beyond the obvious lesson that I should be making ESPN money for that bit of prognostication, there is also a lesson far more useful for today's Marlins devotee. For fan temperature seems to have reached a point where it's worth pointing out how unlikely a manager change is this season, and how little of an impact it would even have on any of the things fans are angry about. Before diving into McCullough specifically, allow me to address anyone sitting there thinking I'm off in my terminated manager count. Sure, you could read between the lines all you want on Miami's "mutual parting of the ways" with Mattingly and Skip Schumaker. However, you can't deny that Bruce Sherman has never fired a manger— capital F, publicly stating you were bad at your job Fired—during his tenure. Manager or general manager, all prominent changes happened in the offseason, with the mask of those mutual differences. He has been far more patient than his predecessor. Partly, that comes down to what is surely just a genuine difference in temperament between Loria and Sherman. Yet it's hard to conclude that just as much of it hasn't been a deliberate commitment to changing Miami's image. Change was needed. In other words, Sherman's track record says no change is coming before October. Period. Everyone the Marlins have moved on from completed their contract. McCullough is extremely unlikely to be an exception. It's also important to stress the difference in circumstances. Every other time a Marlins manager has been fired midseason, there were serious expectations for better play, ones typically backed by aggressive offseason signings and/or front office bluster. The 2026 Marlins expected to better, sure, but drawing a comp between them and the 1996, 2001, 2003, 2010, and 2015 Marlins would be pushing it. Those teams were all much better positioned for success. As I've said before, John Boles is probably the best comparison for Clayton McCullough when it comes to previous Marlins skippers. But if McCullough does go as Boles did, it's more likely to be like when Miami moved on from Boles after 1996 than during 2001. This team was supposed to improve, and still might. That doesn't mean the investment in it happening was high enough to warrant an early firing though if that improvement doesn't happen. There has been no Guillen-esque PR disaster. No clubhouse meeting heard round the world. Nothing off the field to support such a rash decision. Bringing it back to McCullough specifically though, there are two reasons that Marlins fans shouldn't be so quick to wish for him being shown the door. Or at the very least, thinking it will change anything. For one, what would a manager firing do to the identify of those scrappy, in every game to the very last out Miami Marlins you've come to know and love? Obviously, much of that has to do with the players on the field. But a team's identity does tend to be linked to the individual leading it, and that's McCullough. Would a new manager push all those same buttons? Would this clubhouse receive a change well? Again, there's been no evidence that McCullough has lost it. Just evidence that a talent gap remains between the Marlins and more serious contenders. That's not a McCullough problem. It's a front office one. Secondly, let's talk a little bit more about that front office. They aren't going anywhere. Back in the old days of 1993-2023, changing the manager might have had a dramatic impact on how Miami operates. In the brave new world Peter Bendix and company have brought the Marlins into? Waaaay more debatable. That's not a slight against the team's increased reliance on analytics either but merely to say that any new manager Miami brings in is going to be expected to continue to tow the company line. Meaning that any of the things that have upset fans to this point are still going to be there. Platoons. Bullpen decisions. Quick hooks for starting pitchers. All of those decisions have been backed by a massive pile of numbers. The Marlins are going to continue to provide their manager those numbers...and expect their manager to act on them. None of that adds up to a manager change making sense for the Marlins in 2026. View full article

As you might have heard, the Miami Marlins got a bit creative with their start time recently. The organization made the curious choice to go with a 4:10 pm start this past Tuesday with an eye towards seeing if any kind of attendance boost could be gained from such a move. Once you get past the absurdness, the possible advantages are obvious. No rush hour. Works pretty cleanly as an after-school activity. No need to push back bedtime too much. What's not to like? Well, plenty, if the social media response to this is any guide. That 4:10 pm first pitch is even more of a non-starter than usual for the Broward County crowd. If you work a 9 to 5 job? Clearly not happening either, and in that case, some of the angst this experiment has seemed to cause is even understandable. After all, thousands of South Floridians were unable to attend as a result. It would have been particularly upsetting if you were one of the precious few who regularly attend Marlins games. Should we now count how many potential Marlins ticket buyers work non-traditional hours, though? Add up all the teachers? Then tack on all the hospitality workers and a big chunk of first responders? Tabulate all the people able to telecommute and essentially decide when they work and when they don't? Point being, there is no perfect start time. Nothing is going to be convenient for everyone. Over 2 million people live in Dade County alone, and there are less than 40,000 seats in loanDepot park. Which means that in a vacuum, there are plenty of ways for the ticket-buying math to math in the Marlins favor. Of course, as everyone reading this knows, you can't view anything the Marlins do attendance-wise in a vacuum. Merely shuffling a start time is rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic, putting lipstick on a pig level stuff for this franchise. Until they win consistently, and very likely spend more on payroll to do so, no dramatic turnaround at the ticket window is coming. However, that doesn't mean it isn't worth the Marlins time to get creative at drawing more people in. They just need to be far more aggressive at doing so than they have been so far. The same kind of aggressiveness that the club has taken with their analytics and player development should be pursued in boosting attendance. In 2003, the team created special D-Train inspired flex packages to give fans plenty of flexibility in when to come out to the ballpark. While the team doesn't have as equally marketable of a star right now, the idea of any kind of incentive for fans to buy multiple tickets seems worth considering. With thousands of empty seats, it's hard to see what the team would have to lose by even offering 2-for-1 seats, at least for weekday games. And speaking of weekday games, I'm not sure there's a summer camp in Miami that shouldn't be getting heavily discounted tickets to those June and July weekday afternoon starts. Not to mention sending those campers home with a voucher for a free ticket to a future game in case those campers are inclined to tell their parents how much fun they had. As long I'm spending Bruce Sherman's money, though, a radical idea even dearer to my heart would be bussing. The Marlins already have a trolley linked up with the Metrorail, and a bus deal set up with Brightline. Unfortunately, one of those serves a very narrow range that is already close enough to the stadium and the other involves an expensive train that is so popular it is heading for bankruptcy court. But what if the Marlins arranged for a location nearer to Broward to bus in all those fans that wring their hands at the prospect of driving much farther than they did in the past to get to a Marlins game? Hard Rock Stadium, perhaps? Not even kind of kidding, at least not for the many months the Dolphins aren't a factor. There might not be enough parking lot space for the Super Bowl's liking these days, but there's more than enough for Broward-based Marlins fans to park their cars and hop on a bus that gets them to loanDepot in time for first pitch. Same goes for Amerant Bank Arena when the Panthers aren't playing. Even if the stadium owners netted all the parking fees, the Marlins would still benefit plenty from tickets and concessions, as well as the potential for some fan goodwill from going that extra mile. Again, there are no silver bullets for the Marlins attendance woes beyond winning. Ideas like Tuesday's start time shuffle are a step in the right direction, but need to be part of a much more concentrated, creative effort to get people in the door. In my humble opinion, the suggestions offered here would be much more impactful. As would plenty of other ideas, I'm sure. Then again, I'm the kind of fan who used to cheerfully sneak out of school and endure summer rainouts in order to attend games. I presently live in Texas and have already been to three Marlins home games this season. Admittedly, I might not be the best sample size here. So the odd 4:10 pm start isn't something I have an issue with—this team needs to leave no stone unturned in generating interest and revenue. With attendance numbers as bad as Miami's, there are no bad ideas. Seeing as how only 7,521 people showed up for a showdown with the rival Braves, and this was only the third-best crowd on a Tuesday all season? Looks like it'll be back to the drawing board. Until the wins increase, tinker away, Marlins. Tinker away. View full article