blackmarketbaby.com

The downside is monetary cost, which, if significant, will impact the front office's ability to address other roster needs (C). Maybe Anderson hasn't signed yet because he's holding out for big AAV $$$, a long-term deal, or both. Mondesi will come relatively cheap and is a switch-hitter who could be used in a platoon with another bargain bin SS. Consider that Andrus, who played in 112 games and turned in 1.1 WAR last year, hits lefties a little better than righties. I agree that Anderson probably has the most upside of these three, but there is some potential for downside there.

El Comando es disponible! Seriously, though: 35-year old Elvis Andrus can still provide good defensive value at SS, some streaky contact-oriented offense to the tune of ~ .700 OPS, leadership for younger (Latino) players, and a predicted 1.0 WAR in 2024. Plus, he's a free agent who should come cheap on a one or two year deal and will not cost the Marlins any prospects. Does Andrus upgrade the current roster? It's a low risk, low reward addition (as opposed to the high risk, high reward proposition of Tim Anderson).

Are the Marlins a contender in 2024? If so, they should not trade away pitchers, especially young, talented, and controllable starters. There is no such thing as a surplus when it comes to pitchers; they're just too volatile and injury-prone in today's MLB. If there's no way to contend in 2024, then commence with a fire sale.

Sign Carlos Santana instead, to play 1B. Slide Bell into the DH role. Keep farm assets. Two switch hitters with power in the lineup every day.